Succession Wars: The Hinduja family’s bitter battle for control

“Blood is thicker than water,” a saying that has echoed through generations, implies that family bonds are unbreakable. Yet, the saga of the Hinduja family proves that even the strongest ties can fray under the weight of ambition and discord. Once celebrated for their unity and shared vision, the four Hinduja brothers became embroiled in a bitter feud that transformed their illustrious legacy into a high-stakes drama. However, recent developments have shown that reconciliation is possible, even in the face of seemingly insurmountable differences.
For decades, the Hinduja family has been synonymous with wealth, power, and global influence. As the heads of the Hinduja Group, one of the world’s largest and most diversified conglomerates, the four Hinduja brothers—Srichand, Gopichand, Prakash, and Ashok—have overseen operations spanning banking, energy, healthcare, and more. Yet, beneath this veneer of unity and success, a bitter family feud emerged, threatening not only the cohesion of the Hinduja dynasty but also the stability of their multi-billion-dollar empire.

The Hinduja brothers

The Hinduja family story begins with Parmanand Deepchand Hinduja, who founded the business in 1914 in Mumbai, India. From its humble beginnings as a trading firm, the company quickly grew, establishing a significant presence across industries such as automotive, with Ashok Leyland; banking, with IndusInd Bank; healthcare; and energy.
At the heart of this success was a unique family philosophy: trust, unity, and shared ownership. This approach allowed the four brothers to work seamlessly as a team, managing different branches of the business in various parts of the world, from London to Geneva and Mumbai. For years, the brothers upheld the principle that all assets belonged to the family as a collective, avoiding individual control over particular assets.
The philosophy of collective ownership was formalised in a 2014 letter signed by all four brothers. The letter stated, “Everything belongs to everyone, and nothing belongs to anyone.” It was intended to reaffirm the family’s long-standing tradition of shared control, ensuring that no single brother had ownership over any part of the business.
However, this document, which once symbolised family unity, eventually became the catalyst for a protracted legal battle. The first cracks in the family’s solidarity became public in 2020 when Srichand Hinduja, the eldest brother and patriarch of the family, challenged the enforceability of the 2014 letter through his daughter, Vinoo Hinduja.
The legal battle over the 2014 letter played out in the UK courts, with Vinoo Hinduja’s claims against her uncles—Gopichand, Prakash, and Ashok—being intensely scrutinised. The case revealed deep-seated tensions within the family, with allegations of attempts to sideline Srichand and exert control over his assets.
In 2022, the UK High Court ruled in favour of Srichand’s side, stating that the letter did not automatically confer control of assets to the other brothers. The court highlighted that each brother had the right to independently manage the assets they were overseeing, contradicting the idea of collective ownership. This ruling was seen as a victory for Srichand and his heirs but did little to heal the rift within the family at the time.
The family dispute took a significant turn in May 2023 with the passing of Srichand Hinduja at the age of 87. His death marked not only the end of an era for the Hinduja Group but also became a catalyst for family reconciliation. The loss of the family patriarch seems to have prompted a reevaluation of priorities among the remaining brothers and the next generation of Hindujas.
In a surprising turn of events, the family announced a settlement to their long-standing dispute in November 2023. This agreement effectively ended years of legal battles and public discord. The brothers agreed to split the business empire, marking a departure from their long-held principle of collective ownership.
The settlement involved a significant redistribution of assets among family members. Notably, Srichand’s branch of the family, led by his daughters Vinoo and Shanu, took control of Hinduja Bank in Switzerland. This move aligned with Srichand’s historical oversight of the bank and respected his wish for his immediate family to manage this key asset.
Other assets of the vast Hinduja empire were distributed among the remaining brothers—Gopichand, Prakash, and Ashok. While the exact details of the distribution remain private, industry observers note that the settlement appears to have been crafted to balance the interests of all parties involved.
The resolution of the family dispute has brought the next generation of Hindujas into sharper focus. Srichand’s daughters, Vinoo and Shanu, have taken on more prominent roles in managing their father’s legacy, particularly with regard to Hinduja Bank. Their increased involvement signals a shift in family dynamics and potentially in management style for parts of the Hinduja Group.
Similarly, the children of the other Hinduja brothers are expected to play larger roles in their respective areas of the now-divided business empire. This generational transition, while challenging, may bring fresh perspectives and new strategies to the various Hinduja enterprises.
As the dust settles on the Hinduja family saga, we’re reminded of the age-old adage: ‘Mo’ money, mo’ problems.’ The Hinduja brothers’ journey from a united front to a fractured dynasty serves as a modern-day King Lear, where the division of a vast empire leads to unforeseen consequences.
In many ways, the Hinduja story mirrors conflicts we see in our own lives, albeit on a grander scale. Who hasn’t witnessed a family squabble over a modest inheritance or a sibling rivalry over parental attention? The Hinduja feud is these relatable conflicts writ large, with billions of dollars at stake instead of grandma’s china set.
The resolution of the Hinduja dispute also echoes a theme familiar to many: the idea that sometimes, letting go is the only way to move forward. Like a couple deciding to consciously uncouple for the sake of their children, the Hinduja brothers chose to divide their empire to preserve what remains of their family bonds and legacy.
Yet, as we watch this billionaire family divide their spoils, we’re left to ponder: At what point does accumulating wealth cease to bring joy and start to breed discontent? The Hinduja saga is a stark reminder that money, while solving many problems, can create entirely new ones.